About This Blog

Judging Crimes is a blog about criminal law, violent crime and the judiciary, dedicated to making the liberal case for greater democratic control of the criminal justice system.  It's a "view from the trenches" because it's written by a practitioner, not an academic or journalist.  It examines the changing role of the judiciary in American society by looking at what judges actually do, rather than what they say.  I know what they do because I deal with the consequences every day. 

Opinions issued by judges, from Supreme Court justices on down, are justifications for the exercise of governmental power.  But it is the exercise of power itself that should command our attention, not the justifications.  Judging Crimes is concerned with the reality of judicial power rather than the verbal formulas used to defend it. 

American law professors have long liked to say they teach their students "to think like a lawyer."  Learning to think that way is a matter of internalizing certain assumptions.  The practice of judging is likewise based on a foundation of shared assumptions, among them that the United States Constitution -- a document of 8,335 words, the length of a book chapter -- provides an answer to every question.  Rather like a Ouija board.

These assumptions are so ingrained -- and their internalization is so necessary to the successful practice of law -- that most people who subscribe to them aren't even aware of having done so.  Judging Crimes will try to engage not just with the expressions of judicial power, but with the assumptions on which those expressions  rest.  

Judging Crimes won't be filled with daily entries commenting on the day's events or provide a best-of-the-web welter of links.  Many other blogs already do that, far better than I could hope to do.  (Check out these.)  Instead, Judging Crimes will contain pieces of a length that might seem long for a blog but would be short in a serious magazine.  I hope to post new pieces several times a week.

Powered by Squarespace
What's not to like?

Hit the "like" button on Facebook to be notified of mini-blog entries and new posts and columns.

In Our Name
Test Drive the Book!
« 358. Instant evolution's gonna get you | Main | 357. Disposable people »
Sunday
Sep212008

Big changes coming

I recently signed a contract for a second book to be published in 2009.  (Here's information about the first.)  The newer new book, to be called For the Sake of Argument: A Life in the Law, will be published by Kaplan Publishing, the trade-book division of the big test-prep company

It will be about the study and practice of law and will take the form of a memoir, but I'm going to leave out the uninteresting autobiographical  bits like my being raised by feral dogs only to fall into a heroin habit after matriculating at Harvard Medical as a 12-year-old.

Taking on these writing commitments has diverted my energy from the blog, as you may have noticed.  Also, I find myself more fascinated by the presidential race than by the relatively trivial disgraces of our judicial system. 

It's such a bizarre year: that New York Times story headlined "Congressional Leaders Stunned by Warnings" on the economy - "the congressional leaders were told 'that we’re literally maybe days away from a complete meltdown of our financial system'" - followed by the Washington Post covering McCain's published praise of bank deregulation under the headline "McCain Health-Care Article Fuels New Clash Over Economy", as if the "clash" were the part that mattered.

And then there's Sarah Palin's gift of an almost precisely 60-second demonstration of her unreadiness to serve as vice president under an elderly cancer patient.

So all of the thoughts about law and the legal profession that until recently were poured into this blog are instead going toward the books, and with the little bit of attention remaining I find myself thinking about things other than the silly affectations of our judges.  Also, I have a nagging feeling that I really ought to focus the website on publicity for the books. 

So here's what probably is going to happen, assuming I can re-figure out how to configure a Squarespace website, three years after I initially launched this blog.

First: a new blog will be started, with a broader focus than the law.  I like the narrow focus of Judging Crimes and don't want to dilute it, but I also want to include topics that will be of more immediate interest to that species known as "non-lawyers."  Two blogs located at the same site seems ridiculous, but since I'm not sure exactly why it's ridiculous I'm going to do it.

Unless someone convinces me it's a really stupid thing to do, I'm going to call the new blog "Think Better Of It," adopting the magpie as a mascot in honor of its reputed habit of snatching shiny objects.

Second, at a more technical level, and assuming I can recall how to configure this thing, the blog will become just one page embedded within the website vaingloriously known as JoelJacobsen.com. 

Third, I might even put some pictures up.  Maybe even a more recent photo of me.

Fourth, other stuff that escapes me at this precise moment.  Stay tuned.

Reader Comments (1)

You are an exceptional personality as a blogger. i am a web designer and working in bitwords.com for 4year. now i have decided to start blogging and i will be having an eye on your activity of blogging.
thanks for this.
July 30, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterWeb Design Company

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.