About This Blog

Judging Crimes is a blog about criminal law, violent crime and the judiciary, dedicated to making the liberal case for greater democratic control of the criminal justice system.  It's a "view from the trenches" because it's written by a practitioner, not an academic or journalist.  It examines the changing role of the judiciary in American society by looking at what judges actually do, rather than what they say.  I know what they do because I deal with the consequences every day. 

Opinions issued by judges, from Supreme Court justices on down, are justifications for the exercise of governmental power.  But it is the exercise of power itself that should command our attention, not the justifications.  Judging Crimes is concerned with the reality of judicial power rather than the verbal formulas used to defend it. 

American law professors have long liked to say they teach their students "to think like a lawyer."  Learning to think that way is a matter of internalizing certain assumptions.  The practice of judging is likewise based on a foundation of shared assumptions, among them that the United States Constitution -- a document of 8,335 words, the length of a book chapter -- provides an answer to every question.  Rather like a Ouija board.

These assumptions are so ingrained -- and their internalization is so necessary to the successful practice of law -- that most people who subscribe to them aren't even aware of having done so.  Judging Crimes will try to engage not just with the expressions of judicial power, but with the assumptions on which those expressions  rest.  

Judging Crimes won't be filled with daily entries commenting on the day's events or provide a best-of-the-web welter of links.  Many other blogs already do that, far better than I could hope to do.  (Check out these.)  Instead, Judging Crimes will contain pieces of a length that might seem long for a blog but would be short in a serious magazine.  I hope to post new pieces several times a week.

Powered by Squarespace
What's not to like?

Hit the "like" button on Facebook to be notified of mini-blog entries and new posts and columns.

In Our Name
Test Drive the Book!
« 342. From the mouths of babes | Main | 341. Judge Harry Pregerson Memorial Interchange »
Saturday
Feb092008

341.1 Judge Harry Pregerson Memorial Frontage Road

Good ol' Anonymous posted a comment to the main road of this post explaining the origin of the Judge Pregerson Memorial MixMaster, even supplying a link to a New York Times article explaining the judge's deep involvement in the development of the project.   As a district judge, Pregerson oversaw litigation that fattened the Westlaw database by 13 opinions over the course of 25 years, even continuing to sit as trial judge by designation after his elevation to the Ninth Circuit.

I'm pretty sympathetic to the goal of ameliorating the community disruption caused by freeway construction.  Community-buster Robert Moses, I'm convinced, bore more responsibility than any other individual for New York's decline into the ungovernable city. 

Still, I can't help but suspect that it's within the realm of possibility that the California Department of Transportation, which signed the consent decree overseen by Pregerson, didn't put up much of a fight when its legal opponents demanded it receive $2.2 billion to spend

Consent decrees, by which executive branch agencies pretend to lose lawsuits in order to bind their legislatures without all the muss and fuss of the democratic process, give judges the glory of increasing spending in the public eye while leaving to legislators the unpleasant task of trimming other budget items during contentious late-night committee meetings. 

Consent decrees are another type of community-busting: replacing Jacobean mob rule with the more decisive rule of a king and his lawyer-courtiers.  Still, dubious methods frequently produce beneficial effects.  It's just money, after all.

So the green sign dedicating the freeway interchange to Judge Pregerson can be viewed as a reward for his his hard judicial labor ordering other people to perform hard real labor.  Viewed in that way, it's an odd honor - even if, as I suggested, a cheap and rather ambiguous one.  Naming rights are apparently considered valuable things, in some contexts.  Isn't there something a bit ... odd about a federal judge accepting something of value as additional compensation for doing his job?

But, I think, that's not the right way to look at it.  I think the interchange was named for him in very much the same spirit in which the airport freeway itself is officially named the Dan Ryan Freeway, or Glenn Anderson Expressway, or whatever.  

It's the true Chicago spirit.  On my first visit to Chicago, every downtown street corner had paint on the pavement reminding me to visit "Mayor Jane Byrne's ChicagoFest."  You could register your car or renew your driver's license at "Secretary of State JIM EDGAR's" storefront operations.

Pregerson's name on the interchange isn't a monument to his judicial service.  It's an acknowledgment that he was the political boss in charge of the project.

Reader Comments (1)

Specialists argue that <a href="http://lowest-rate-loans.com/topics/mortgage-loans">www.lowest-rate-loans.com</a> help a lot of people to live the way they want, just because they can feel free to buy necessary goods. Moreover, a lot of banks offer secured loan for different classes of people.
June 23, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterBoyerRita30

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.