367. Life's a Blitch
On Wednesday a Tennessee judge, Ronald E. Darby, was indicted. He sits on the court of General Sessions - what used to be called JP court, hearing misdemeanor and small claims cases - in Benton County, up in the northwest part of the state, not so very far from the southern tip of Illinois.
Benton County is a rural area of the state. Its population density ranks it 74th among Tennessee counties, and it's poorer than the average county, too. Wikipedia says it is known locally "for its duck hunting and fishing industries" - which I didn't even know were industries.
Judges in such isolated areas can establish despotisms. The most extreme example is the psychopathic David Lanier (scroll down), who presided over family court in another western Tennessee county, Dyer, for the opportunity it provided him to rape female litigants in his soundproofed, windowless office.
Darby isn't accused of anything remotely as bad as that. But I wonder if a judge's great power in an isolated area combined with a lack of adult supervision might have given him an exaggerated (even if less-exaggerated) sense of either entitlement or invulnerability.
According to the Camden Chronicle:
(Do judges in your neck of the woods hand out Bibles?)
Anyway, the allegation is that the "community service" the probationers performed tended to be concentrated on land owned by Judge Darby himself.
Darby's surrender to temptation reminded me of a summertime story about another rural judge who found it hard to resist picking up a few extra perks of the job.
Judge Brooks E. Blitch, III, hailed from Clinch County, Georgia, which gave him jurisdiction over a portion of the Okefenokee swamp, meaning that his constituents included Albert, Porky, Churchy and Pogo himself.
An Atlanta Journal-Constitution article from April sets the scene, and vividly illustrates just how much power a judge can wield in rural counties:
Unfortunately, although Blitch is now gone, it doesn't appear the Journal-Constitution has gone back to hear what Mr. Smith might have to say.
In July, when you'd think it would be far too hot in Okefenokee for anything but fishin', the FBI arrested Judge Blitch "on federal corruption charges that he illegally paid employees with court fees, gave high-paying jobs to friends and fixed cases."
I was particularly intrigued by the judicial slush fund alleged in the indictment:
I imagine it would be remarkably easy to set up something like that. In effect, it allowed the judge to control the county's budget to a remarkable degree, at least according to the county commissioners.
Also alleged: he created no-show courthouse jobs for friends. And, inevitably,
There were even - allegedly - fixers working the courthouse, accepting fees for getting Blitch to take favorable action. Blitch resigned from the judgeship just ahead of the Georgia Judicial Qualifications Commission hearing.
How could things have gotten so bad and gone on so long? Easy. No Georgia Superior Court judge has been removed from office "in almost 50 years." That means: Georgia Superior Court judges aren't subject to any serious risk of disciplinary proceedings until things get bad and go on a long time. Which means: they're free to ignore the law and ethical rules so long as they don't get carried away.
All three cases - the monster Lanier, the (alleged) little chiseler Darby, and the (alleged) swamp capo Blitch - all seem to me to present the same basic story. If you give people unrestrained power, some percentage of them will use it without restraint.
The abuse of judicial power is easiest to get away with it in rural counties, far from the nearest investigative reporters, where local lawyers understand how suicidal it would be to complain (and how dangerous to one's clients, whom the judge holds hostage) and everyone else can be easily snookered with legal mumbo-jumbo.
For every judge like that we hear about, there are many, many more hiding and multiplying behind our courthouse walls.
Saturday, October 25, 2008 at 11:46AM in
Crimes of Judging,
Individual judges,
Judicial independence/autonomy

Reader Comments (3)