About This Blog

Judging Crimes is a blog about criminal law, violent crime and the judiciary, dedicated to making the liberal case for greater democratic control of the criminal justice system.  It's a "view from the trenches" because it's written by a practitioner, not an academic or journalist.  It examines the changing role of the judiciary in American society by looking at what judges actually do, rather than what they say.  I know what they do because I deal with the consequences every day. 

Opinions issued by judges, from Supreme Court justices on down, are justifications for the exercise of governmental power.  But it is the exercise of power itself that should command our attention, not the justifications.  Judging Crimes is concerned with the reality of judicial power rather than the verbal formulas used to defend it. 

American law professors have long liked to say they teach their students "to think like a lawyer."  Learning to think that way is a matter of internalizing certain assumptions.  The practice of judging is likewise based on a foundation of shared assumptions, among them that the United States Constitution -- a document of 8,335 words, the length of a book chapter -- provides an answer to every question.  Rather like a Ouija board.

These assumptions are so ingrained -- and their internalization is so necessary to the successful practice of law -- that most people who subscribe to them aren't even aware of having done so.  Judging Crimes will try to engage not just with the expressions of judicial power, but with the assumptions on which those expressions  rest.  

Judging Crimes won't be filled with daily entries commenting on the day's events or provide a best-of-the-web welter of links.  Many other blogs already do that, far better than I could hope to do.  (Check out these.)  Instead, Judging Crimes will contain pieces of a length that might seem long for a blog but would be short in a serious magazine.  I hope to post new pieces several times a week.

Powered by Squarespace
What's not to like?

Hit the "like" button on Facebook to be notified of mini-blog entries and new posts and columns.

In Our Name
Test Drive the Book!
« 368. "I have not been convicted" | Main | 366. What's the matter with Minnesota? »
Saturday
Oct252008

367. Life's a Blitch

On Wednesday a Tennessee judge, Ronald E. Darby, was indicted. He sits on the court of General Sessions - what used to be called JP court, hearing misdemeanor and small claims cases - in Benton County, up in the northwest part of the state, not so very far from the southern tip of Illinois.

Benton County is a rural area of the state. Its population density ranks it 74th among Tennessee counties, and it's poorer than the average county, too. Wikipedia says it is known locally "for its duck hunting and fishing industries" - which I didn't even know were industries.

Judges in such isolated areas can establish despotisms. The most extreme example is the psychopathic David Lanier (scroll down), who presided over family court in another western Tennessee county, Dyer, for the opportunity it provided him to rape female litigants in his soundproofed, windowless office.

Darby isn't accused of anything remotely as bad as that. But I wonder if a judge's great power in an isolated area combined with a lack of adult supervision might have given him an exaggerated (even if less-exaggerated) sense of either entitlement or invulnerability.

According to the Camden Chronicle:

In May of 2007 Darby started a drug court in Benton County that would allow participants to participate in a program of rehabilitation. The program was designed for non-violent drug offenders who were seeking to rehabilitate their lives by getting off drugs. The program required the participants to provide community service and encouraged participants to seek employment. The program allowed participants to remain out of jail as long as they complied with the requirements that were set forth by the court. Funding for the program was provided by the State of Tennessee.

On September 4, Darby held a graduation ceremony for eight of the drug court members who had completed the program. During the ceremony Darby stated that these eight had completed all of the requirements of the three- phase program. They had remained drug and alcohol free for one year and 40 days and one couple had regained custody of their children. Graduates were presented with a certificate and a bible.

(Do judges in your neck of the woods hand out Bibles?)

Anyway, the allegation is that the "community service" the probationers performed tended to be concentrated on land owned by Judge Darby himself.

Darby's surrender to temptation reminded me of a summertime story about another rural judge who found it hard to resist picking up a few extra perks of the job.

Judge Brooks E. Blitch, III, hailed from Clinch County, Georgia, which gave him jurisdiction over a portion of the Okefenokee swamp, meaning that his constituents included Albert, Porky, Churchy and Pogo himself.

An Atlanta Journal-Constitution article from April sets the scene, and vividly illustrates just how much power a judge can wield in rural counties:

Ted Smith could tell you about Superior Court Judge Brooks E. Blitch III. But Ted Smith isn't talking.

He's fidgeting. His eyes won't meet yours, and he's rubbing his lips with a rough callused hand.

"He ain't gone yet," he says, referring to the judge whose office is just a few blocks away. "He's still got power —- and I ain't talking until he ain't."

People not talking and suddenly nervous at the drop of the Blitch name has become commonplace in this sleepy little town (pop. 2,803) that suddenly isn't so restful in the rural southeast corner of Georgia, about 250 miles from Atlanta.

Judge Blitch is 73 years old and has sat on the bench since 1980.

He grew up in a family that has wielded power over this corner of the world for six decades.

His late mother, Iris Blitch, was elected to the state Legislature in 1947 and later served eight years as a U.S. congresswoman. His wife, Peg Blitch, served 12 years in the state Senate before leaving office in 2004.

Unfortunately, although Blitch is now gone, it doesn't appear the Journal-Constitution has gone back to hear what Mr. Smith might have to say.

In July, when you'd think it would be far too hot in Okefenokee for anything but fishin', the FBI arrested Judge Blitch "on federal corruption charges that he illegally paid employees with court fees, gave high-paying jobs to friends and fixed cases."

I was particularly intrigued by the judicial slush fund alleged in the indictment:

The indictment says Blitch and Sutton ordered more than $73,000 in illegal payments to county employees that came from $15 and $10 fees charged to criminal defendants between 2001 and 2007. The fees were collected into a bank account kept secret from county budget officers, and payments made to employees were never taxed.

I imagine it would be remarkably easy to set up something like that. In effect, it allowed the judge to control the county's budget to a remarkable degree, at least according to the county commissioners.

Also alleged: he created no-show courthouse jobs for friends. And, inevitably,

The indictment also lists dozens of cases in which attorneys and friends of criminal defendants sought favors from Blitch outside of court. In many cases, prosecutors say, Blitch granted them by reducing sentences, terminating probation sentences and ordering defendants' early release from jail or prison — often without hearings or notifying prosecutors.

There were even - allegedly - fixers working the courthouse, accepting fees for getting Blitch to take favorable action. Blitch resigned from the judgeship just ahead of the Georgia Judicial Qualifications Commission hearing.

How could things have gotten so bad and gone on so long? Easy. No Georgia Superior Court judge has been removed from office "in almost 50 years." That means: Georgia Superior Court judges aren't subject to any serious risk of disciplinary proceedings until things get bad and go on a long time. Which means: they're free to ignore the law and ethical rules so long as they don't get carried away.

All three cases - the monster Lanier, the (alleged) little chiseler Darby, and the (alleged) swamp capo Blitch - all seem to me to present the same basic story. If you give people unrestrained power, some percentage of them will use it without restraint.

The abuse of judicial power is easiest to get away with it in rural counties, far from the nearest investigative reporters, where local lawyers understand how suicidal it would be to complain (and how  dangerous to one's clients, whom the judge holds hostage) and everyone else can be easily snookered with legal mumbo-jumbo.

For every judge like that we hear about, there are many, many more hiding and multiplying behind our courthouse walls.

Reader Comments (3)

Joel My family and I were held "HOSTAGE' down there in Nashville Ga. 8 months we were not permitted out of our cell! And we were charged 25 dollars a day! ( Where did that money GO ) Each to stay there. My husband needed his meds and we were told by Brogdon ( he and Blitch are joined at the hip ) that we had to pay 100.00 dollars to go to the docters even though he had refils and all that was needed was to go to the store and pay a co-pay and trust me there were no rules to stop ANYTHING FROM HAPPENING IN BARRIEN COUNTY GA.. So he went 8 months without his meds and now has had three heart attacks We were told over and over that they would drive us to the swamps and we would never be seen again. We were given a meal at 6 a.m. and one at 6 p.m. We had one frosted window and a12 by 12 inch bared window on the steal door. that was our view for 8 months. the deputies would come in and take one of us " RIDE'N" they would turn the heat on in Georgia in the summer and let us know that it would "Be best " for us to give up!! I passed out from the closed windows and being in handcuffs I could not open the window. We would not give the where abouts of a person who was in danger from Brogdon and Blitch. I understand why noone will talk down there, It is a "safe county" for drug trafficer's for a reason. The prieit planes that came in every Sunday ... the things that we know and can nerver talk about. dangerous to talk thus I am not leaving my name however thank you for putting this on your Blog.
July 8, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterRemember u 5
Just wanted you to know, that everyone that has been able to afford to go to trial has won. So Mr. Jacobsen be carful what you print. Escpecially since you have no idea what you are writing about. Once again, a world full of idiots.
August 2, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterRandy
I will recommend not to wait until you earn big sum of cash to order goods! You can just take the <a href="http://lowest-rate-loans.com/topics/business-loans">business loans</a> or sba loan and feel fine
March 19, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterSosaWanda28

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.