About This Blog

Judging Crimes is a blog about criminal law, violent crime and the judiciary, dedicated to making the liberal case for greater democratic control of the criminal justice system.  It's a "view from the trenches" because it's written by a practitioner, not an academic or journalist.  It examines the changing role of the judiciary in American society by looking at what judges actually do, rather than what they say.  I know what they do because I deal with the consequences every day. 

Opinions issued by judges, from Supreme Court justices on down, are justifications for the exercise of governmental power.  But it is the exercise of power itself that should command our attention, not the justifications.  Judging Crimes is concerned with the reality of judicial power rather than the verbal formulas used to defend it. 

American law professors have long liked to say they teach their students "to think like a lawyer."  Learning to think that way is a matter of internalizing certain assumptions.  The practice of judging is likewise based on a foundation of shared assumptions, among them that the United States Constitution -- a document of 8,335 words, the length of a book chapter -- provides an answer to every question.  Rather like a Ouija board.

These assumptions are so ingrained -- and their internalization is so necessary to the successful practice of law -- that most people who subscribe to them aren't even aware of having done so.  Judging Crimes will try to engage not just with the expressions of judicial power, but with the assumptions on which those expressions  rest.  

Judging Crimes won't be filled with daily entries commenting on the day's events or provide a best-of-the-web welter of links.  Many other blogs already do that, far better than I could hope to do.  (Check out these.)  Instead, Judging Crimes will contain pieces of a length that might seem long for a blog but would be short in a serious magazine.  I hope to post new pieces several times a week.

Powered by Squarespace
What's not to like?

Hit the "like" button on Facebook to be notified of mini-blog entries and new posts and columns.

In Our Name
Test Drive the Book!
« 17. Avery and Rulloff | Main | 15. Execution Eve »
Tuesday
Dec132005

16. Another Problem with Prison Rehabilitation

I grew up with the idea that it was liberal to think that the purpose of prison is, or should be, rehabilitation.  But that idea leads to a very illiberal consequence: it makes incarceration for drug crimes halfway-plausible.

Another – and, I think, more realistic – way to think of prison is as exile.  Prison is a casting-out from society, a way to isolate those people who have demonstrated their inability to live in society without hurting others.  If you think of prison in those seemingly-primitive terms, then locking people up for using drugs makes no sense at all.  Addicts are dangerous to themselves, and to those unfortunate enough to love or trust them.  But the metaphorical knife to the heart is qualitatively different from the literal one.

The central goal of criminal law, and perhaps the only goal, should be to identify, as accurately and certainly as possible, dangerous violent people, the people described by Lonnie Athens, who was so memorably profiled by Richard Rhodes, and by Robert D. Hare, creator of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist.  There was a good reason for our ancestors to huddle together in the back of the cave.  And it remains the most important function of government.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.