About This Blog

Judging Crimes is a blog about criminal law, violent crime and the judiciary, dedicated to making the liberal case for greater democratic control of the criminal justice system.  It's a "view from the trenches" because it's written by a practitioner, not an academic or journalist.  It examines the changing role of the judiciary in American society by looking at what judges actually do, rather than what they say.  I know what they do because I deal with the consequences every day. 

Opinions issued by judges, from Supreme Court justices on down, are justifications for the exercise of governmental power.  But it is the exercise of power itself that should command our attention, not the justifications.  Judging Crimes is concerned with the reality of judicial power rather than the verbal formulas used to defend it. 

American law professors have long liked to say they teach their students "to think like a lawyer."  Learning to think that way is a matter of internalizing certain assumptions.  The practice of judging is likewise based on a foundation of shared assumptions, among them that the United States Constitution -- a document of 8,335 words, the length of a book chapter -- provides an answer to every question.  Rather like a Ouija board.

These assumptions are so ingrained -- and their internalization is so necessary to the successful practice of law -- that most people who subscribe to them aren't even aware of having done so.  Judging Crimes will try to engage not just with the expressions of judicial power, but with the assumptions on which those expressions  rest.  

Judging Crimes won't be filled with daily entries commenting on the day's events or provide a best-of-the-web welter of links.  Many other blogs already do that, far better than I could hope to do.  (Check out these.)  Instead, Judging Crimes will contain pieces of a length that might seem long for a blog but would be short in a serious magazine.  I hope to post new pieces several times a week.

Powered by Squarespace
What's not to like?

Hit the "like" button on Facebook to be notified of mini-blog entries and new posts and columns.

In Our Name
Test Drive the Book!
« 13. "The Government" | Main | 11. What about the Ninth Circuit? »
Saturday
Dec102005

12. It Happens Here

Greece is undergoing a judicial corruption scandal.  It's hard to find any news about it in English, but here's some, and a little more, and some more, and a vivid blog post from December 4, 2005, that tells us that "Dozens of judges, prosecutors, and some high-profile lawyers have been implicated in a many-tentacled, tortuous scheme involving bribes and under-the-table deals to allow criminals to get lighter sentences, or go free, with the least amount of trouble from the courts."

It would be nice to believe that it doesn't happen here.  But the striking feature about some of the most outrageous recent judicial scandals is that they were uncovered by accident.  Louisiana's Judge Ronald Bodenheimer was caught conspiring to plant OxyContin in an antagonist's car only because the feds happened to be investigating the bail bonding system.  The child pornography allegedly stored on the courthouse computer of California's Judge Richard C. Kline would never have come to light but for a hacker who turned the information he gleaned over to authorities

Bribery scandals come to light only when a lawyer touched up by a judge is brave enough to put his or her career on the line by wearing a wire.  In the 1950s, when a lawyer exposed the outrageous corruption in the Oklahoma Supreme Court, that court disbarred him.  Even after his allegations were proven accurate, the judges of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals refused to permit him to practice his profession in their court, as described here (see dissent).  The use of "professional discipline" to intimidate critics of the judiciary isn't a relic of the past, as one Indiana lawyer discovered to his cost.  (This is why I haven't written about the New Mexico courts, of course.)

Common sense tells you that for every instance of judicial criminality uncovered by accident, there are hundreds that aren't.  For every lawyer brave enough to chance his right to practice his profession, there must be dozens who conclude it's cheaper just to pay up. 

Now imagine yourself with inside information about a Greek-type scandal, involving prosecutors and judges mutually on the take.  Would you want to cooperate with the prosecutor's office in its investigation?  Would you want to testify in court against the malefactors?  Greece's scandal should remind us of the scandals we haven't had yet.

Reader Comments (1)

According to my monitoring, millions of people in the world get the <a href="http://lowest-rate-loans.com/topics/home-loans">home loans</a> at various banks. So, there's good possibilities to find a bank loan in any country.
May 29, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAnastasia20KEITH

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.